英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
culinarius查看　culinarius　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
culinarius查看　culinarius　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
culinarius查看　culinarius　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Pierson v. Post - Wikipedia
    Pierson v Post is generally considered the most famous property law case in American legal history [3] Although it only involved a dispute over which of two men deserved ownership of a fox, adjudicating the dispute required determining at what point a wild animal becomes "property"
  • Pierson v. Post | Case Brief for Law Students | Casebriefs
    Pierson was aware of the chase, and he killed the fox and carried it off Post claimed a legal right to possession of the animal, and the lower court agreed with him
  • Pierson v. Post – (IRAC) Case Brief Summary
    Quick Summary Lodowick Post (plaintiff) was hunting a fox when Jesse Pierson (defendant) killed and captured it The dispute arose over whether Post’s pursuit granted him possession of the fox The main issue was whether hunting equates to legal possession
  • Pierson v. Post, 1805 - Historical Society of the New York Courts
    The Court’s majority opinion was written by Daniel Tompkins who cited ancient precedents to support the decision that mere pursuit gave Post no legal right to the fox, and that the animal became Pierson’s property when he intercepted and killed it
  • Pierson v. Post - Case Summary and Case Brief - Legal Dictionary
    Case summary for Pierson v Post: Post was a fox hunter in pursuit of a specific fox Before Post was able to mortally injure or physically catch the fox, Pierson began to pursue and eventually catch the same fox Post brought an action against Pierson for trespass
  • Pierson v Post - Sandra Day OConnor College of Law
    The foregoing authorities are decisive to show that mere pursuit gave Post no legal right to the fox, but that he became the property of Pierson, who intercepted and killed him
  • Pierson v. Post :: 1805 :: New York Other Courts Decisions :: New York . . .
    The question submitted by the counsel in this cause for our determination is, whether Lodowick Post, by the pursuit with his hounds in the manner alleged in his declaration, acquired such a right to, or property in, the fox as will sustain an action against Pierson for killing and taking him away?
  • Pierson v. Post Case Summary - FindLaw
    The trial court ruled in favor of Post, holding that hot pursuit, especially when Pierson knew Post was almost upon the fox, entitled Post to the fox Pierson sought and obtained an order of certiorari from the Supreme Court of Judicature, which agreed to review the lower court’s ruling
  • Pierson v. Post Case Brief – Briefly
    Complete case brief for Pierson v Post (1805), the landmark property law case establishing the rule of capture for wild animals and the acquisition of property rights
  • Pierson v. Post 3 Cal. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (Supreme Court of . . . - MIT
    The question submitted by the counsel in this cause for our determination is, whether Lodowick Post, by the Pursuit with his hounds in the manner alleged in his declaration, acquired such a right to, or property in, the fox, as will sustain an action against Pierson for killing and taking him away?





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009